by Robert Gillis, 5/2009

Note: There be major spoilers ahead, so if you haven’t seen the film (and why the hell not? it’s REALLY good!) you may want to hold off reading the following …

Approximately three gazillion people have written reviews for this new Star Trek film, and about 90% are positive. (This pleases this Trekker immensely, and the idea that a TREK film will break $200 million — and possibly $400 million or more, is just incredible.)

Since so many reviews have been written, covering every aspect of the film, a review by me wouldn’t be very interesting. For a detailed history of the film, cast, creative process and far more, visit www.TrekMovie.com, which I consider to be THE Star Trek site on the web.

But — I loved the new film, and decided to write my thoughts and impressions anyway.

The Film

  • Film is going to be one of the greatest blockbusters of the year and will easily out-profit all previous Trek films.
  • Scope is epic — NEVER seen anything like this in Trek. This film is HUGE.
  • Film needs to be seen multiple times — so much going on all the time. Constant moving, constant action. Never seen the likes of this in Trek before.

Trek Lore

  • Love the countless subtle nods to past Trek: The tribble, Admiral Archer’s beagle, the apple during the Kobayashi Maru, Sulu’s fencing, etc.
  • The concept of using a new, alternate time line is brilliant; as a device it allows real danger and unthinkable occurrences: The death of Amanda, the destruction of Vulcan.
  • As a Trekker I like the idea of using the year as a basis for a star date.
  • The writers CLEARLY love Trek.

USS Kelvin

  • First minutes of movie breathtaking; NEVER seen Trek this large. Kelvin clearly an early ship, very busy, almost primitive. I like that all the Starfleet officers are portrayed as competent and professional — a first for TOS! The imminent danger and ship evacuation — feels real. Death of George Kirk heartbreaking. The scenes as Kelvin destroyed as Jim Kirk is born — WOW.


Vulcan

  • Spock being bullied by his peers consistent with “Journey to Babel” and show that some things are universal. Jacob Kogan as young Spock is exceptionally good. Great actor.
  • Vulcan council speaks of Spock’s “disadvantage” and elaborates that the disadvantage is his human mother. Spock in turn rejects their admission offer; his “Live long and prosper” is stated in such a way that it can only mean, “and go screw yourselves.”
  • Could not believe the death of Amanda or destruction of Vulcan. The writers have balls, that is for sure. This is definitely an alternate time line!
  • Spock’s speech: “I am an endangered species:” Heartbreaking.
  • Spock’s relationship with Uhura — unexpected but well done.

Starfleet and Enterprise

  • Loved that Enterprise is built in Riverside, Iowa.
  • The scenes of Kirk riding up on his motorcycle into the busy shipyard as the music plays, and he makes his choice, are VERY effective.
  • New Enterprise is just fine; yes very advanced but believable. The ship works.
  • Love the new computer and screen graphics. Nice departure from the LCARS of previous series (which I also like)
  • Bridge redesign is phenomenal.
  • Very cool how the view screen is a window.
  • The Enterprise coming out of the clouds on Titan … Just like TWOK: Awe inspiring.
  • Liked the scene of all the shuttles taking off from the hanger. Made Starfleet seem huge. Caught the Star Wars reference: “Vader” assigned to the USS Hood.
  • Nice to see James Cawley (Star Trek Phase II) on the bridge. His work on his vision of Trek is really good.
  • Like the new cadet uniforms a lot, a little Star Wars-ish but great.
  • The “Classic” uniforms look better than ever.
  • Like that the crew of the Enterprise is very large. Makes it seem more real.
  • Liked the debate between Kirk and Spock during the hearing for cheating on the Kobayashi Maru.
  • Sound design VERY new but just the right amount of old effects.

Effects

  • Easy to summarize: Special effects beyond belief. Like nothing we have ever seen before. A+ start to finish.

Cast

  • Casting perfect.
  • Bruce Greenwood as Pike amazing.
  • Erica Bana good; the writers learned from past mistakes of spending too much time with villain talking (Insurrection, Nemesis). Nero appears as needed to advance story. Not the best villain (that would be Khan or Chang) but good performance.
  • Karl Urban seems to be channeling Deforest Kelley. PERFECT.
  • Anton Yelchin fine as Chekov — saves the day more than once. Liked him since Alpha Dog. He’s got a bright future in acting. Plus, he’s really Russian!
  • Sulu is a bad-ass. Takei must be “beaming!” Cho was a great choice.
  • Quinto is the perfect Spock, ahem, after Mr. Nimoy, of course.
  • Ben Cross as Sarek is very good; but I missed Mark Lenard, RIP. Sarek’s admission that he loves Amanda — powerful. Winona Rider fine as Amanda. Would have liked to see more — she has the character down perfectly.
  • Zoe Saldana is IN-CRED-IBLE as Uhura. FINALLY an important team member. Finally more than a “switchboard operator.” Demands to be on the Enterprise and lists her qualifications. Romance with Spock felt organic and not forced. AND finally — a canonical revelation of her first name.
  • Pegg’s Scotty mostly played for laughs, not a great deal of screen time. Accent perfect.
  • Chris Pine’s Kirk plays just the right balance of all of Kirk’s good and bad qualities without imitating Shatner. The scene of Pine’s Kirk in command gold brought cheers. This guy also has a bright future and was a great choice to play the iconic Kirk.

Spock Prime (Nimoy)

  • Nimoy’s role not a cameo; very, very poignant. Very obvious why he took the
    role.
  • Audience applauded when they saw him.
  • Nimoy’s Spock is organic and very necessary to the plot.
  • The scene with the two Spocks, as Spock-Prime explains “a friendship that would define you both” is a defining moment in all Trek. This is a Spock who is at peace with himself, and Nimoy hits this scene out of the park.


My nipicks and the not-so-good:

  • The lens flares are very cool but get annoying at times.
  • Agree with some folks who say that Spock Prime’s mind meld with Kirk to explain what happened in 2387 a little “clunky,” but necessary to explain plot.
  • Jimmy Bennett (Young Kirk) doesn’t look much like Chris Pine.
  • Kirk’s promotion is too fast if he were just a cadet; makes more sense that his grade was lieutenant and that he was referred to as a cadet because he had not yet graduated (or was suspended).
  • While the audience understands why Kirk needed to provoke Spock into an emotional outburst, the crew does not — a small scene where Kirk explains himself to the crew would make sense, to get the crew to trust him.
  • The odds of Kirk finding Spock on Delta Vega are astronomical BUT I agree with idea that the time line was trying to mend itself.
  • Transporter effect so-so; liked the other movie’s effects.
  • Enterprise and Kelvin engine rooms (redressed Budweiser factory) doesn’t work for me at all. I understand they did it to make the ship appear huge, and it looks far better than a CGI creation, but the set just clashes with the rest of the ship so much that it almost takes you out of the film.

To everyone who is upset about the changes to Trek Canon:

  • This is an ALTERNATE TIMELINE. While the film does not make it clear if previous “Original” time line survives; Bob Orci (co-writer) says it does.
  • As further proof of this, my Star Trek DVDs have not vanished so he must be right.
  • It’s a movie, dammit!
  • If all else fails, remember these very wise words from “Austin Powers:”

    Austin Powers: “Wait a tick. Basil, if I travel back to 1969 and I was frozen in 1967, presumably, I could go back and visit my frozen self. But, if I’m still frozen in 1967, how could I have been unthawed in the ’90s and traveled back to… Oh, no, I’ve gone cross-eyed.”
    Basil Exposition: “I suggest you don’t worry about those things and just enjoy yourself. [to camera] “That goes for you all, too.”
    Austin (smiles): “Yes.”


Other thoughts

  • Very grateful no reset button was pressed at the end — this is the new Trek, and anything can happen.
  • Dedicated to Gene and Majel — very appropriate.
  • Beautiful to have Nimoy’s “Space the final frontier.”
  • Beyond perfect; beyond brilliant.
  • The franchise is in good hands.
  • Mr. Abrams, Mr. Orci, Mr. Kurtzman, and Mr. Nimoy: THANK YOU.
Add to Bufferhttp://www.robertxgillis.com/uploaded_images/249-708446.jpgDigg ThisShare via email
+1Share on LinkedInShare on MyspacePin it on PinterestSubmit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on TwitterShare on Xing

Trekmovie reported, “…Star Trek: 2009 writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman said that William Shatner’s cut scene was in the movie and then was written out in a later draft. It would have been at the very end of the movie when Spock Prime meets the younger Spock and speaks to him about the long and enduring friendship that Spock and Kirk needed to form. Spock Prime would have said “Don’t take my word for it” and produced a small holographic device that would have projected a message from the elder Kirk.”)


Presenting … The missing Shatner scene! (Um, one crazy version of it, anyway.)
by Robert Gillis

“Spock, do yourself a favor: put aside logic, do what feels right.” Spock Prime said to Young Spock.

The younger Vulcan nodded, but added, “It is still… Difficult … to comprehend that James Kirk and I will become friends.”

Spock Prime reached into his pocket and retrieved a small disk, “I believe the correct human response would be, ‘Don’t take my word for it … ‘” And with that, a holographic image of an older James T. Kirk came into being.

“This death tape is being brought to you by PriceLine dot com. Bones, Spock. Since you are playing this tape, we will assume that I am dead.”

“What is a TAPE?” the younger Spock asked.

The hologram continued, “I probably died heroically, saving billions of lives in spectacular fashion, phasers blasting away on the Enterprise, and not alone on some backwater planet falling off a rusty bridge or something. Anyway, back to the reason you’re watching this. I assume that the tactical situation is critical and both of you are locked in mortal combat.   It means, Spock that you have control of the ship and are probably making the most difficult decisions of your career, stuff I usually do before breakfast. ”

Kirk continued, “I can offer only one small piece of advice for whatever it’s worth: You can use every scrap of logic and knowledge you have to save the ship, but honestly, what did that ever do for you? Look, just temper your judgment by asking yourself, ‘What would Jim Kirk do?’ If you forget that, these attractive “WWJKD?” bracelets are available at William Shatner dot com.”

Spock-Prime sighed heavily.

Kirk went on, “If you can’t do this, seek out McCoy.  Ask his advice, and, if you find it sound, take it. But if he starts the “Space is disease and danger” speech it’s best just to leave him alone, otherwise he’s likely to start jabbing you with a hypo, and that’s annoying as hell. Bones, you’ve heard what I just told Spock. Help him if you can, but remember he is the captain, his decisions must be followed, without question.

“Humph! I almost kept a straight face there. No, seriously Bones, do what you always do, badger the captain, especially in front of the crew. It’s not like you’re gonna do otherwise. Finally, if either of you ever travel back in time, please tell Picard to exit the Nexus a few days earlier and arrest Soren in ten-forward rather than timing it to the last freaking second, then maybe I … Well, it looks like my time is up, be sure to watch an all new season of Raw Nerve in the fall, and take care.”

As the hologram faded, Spock Prime said, “Forgive me. My logic is uncertain, where my friends are concerned.” He gave the Vulcan salute and added, “Since my customary farewell would seem oddly self-serving, I will only say, if you ever see a ship named “Botany Bay,” fire all phasers and destroy it immediately. Good Luck, Spock.”

Add to Bufferhttp://www.robertxgillis.com/uploaded_images/Spock-and-Kirk-and-Spock-738887.jpgDigg ThisShare via email
+1Share on LinkedInShare on MyspacePin it on PinterestSubmit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on TwitterShare on Xing


by Robert Gillis
Published in the Boston City Paper 10/2008

I met George Takei in 1990 [read here] and along with my best friend David and DC Comics’ Arne Starr, we had lunch at Quincy Market and took a trolley tour of Boston.

George is articulate, passionate about humanity and community, funny, a role model for what it means to be active in your community and for fighting for the oppressed and the forgotten. He sees an injustice and he fights it. I admire him.

George’s legacy was never about Star Trek — it’s about fighting for dignity and equality. He has fought for equality for Japanese-Americans and the rights of others for years, and now fights for equality for gays.

Star Trek’s Deforest Kelley used to speak about how many letters he received from kids who had entered medical school because of his character of Dr. McCoy.

In much the same manner, I believe George and Brad’s high profile and very public, loving wedding will encourage many gay people that they can be public about their love, and have the relationship (and wedding) they want. I certainly hope so.

There was an episode of the TV show “Friends” where Ross’ ex-wife was marrying her girlfriend. While I don’t get my philosophy from pop culture and TV shows, I was always touched by what the minister said as she joined the two women in marriage. She said, “You know, nothing makes God happier than when two people, any two people, come together in love.

What a beautiful sentiment. I could not agree more. No matter what their orientation, two unattached adults in a consensual, loving relationship — that’s never wrong.

It makes me so happy that George and Brad can, in George’s words, “Dignify” their 21 year relationship.

God bless George and Brad for helping pave the way for so many others! Happiness always!

Add to Bufferhttp://www.robertxgillis.com/uploaded_images/George-Takei-marries-Brad-Altman-775291.jpgDigg ThisShare via email
+1Share on LinkedInShare on MyspacePin it on PinterestSubmit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on TwitterShare on Xing


by Robert Gillis

Acknowledging,and still standing by, what I wrote previously (CLICK HERE) about the eleventh Star Trek movie, I must admit that I am following development and production of the film closely and am liking what I am hearing and seeing so far. Perhaps JJ Abrams will succeed in breathing new life into the tired (exhausted?) Trek franchise after all.

That said, recently the impressive teaser trailer for the film was released. It starts with a montage of busy welders and reveals that they are building the starship USS Enterprise in a dockyard (apparently) somewhere on Earth. Interjected into this we hear the sounds of JFK (“…the eyes of the world now look into space”) and NASA (“Godspeed, John Glenn,” etc) during the heyday of the space race, and then Leonard Nimoy’s “Space, the final frontier” voice over, and the reveal of the USS Enterprise saucer, and the unmistakable Alexander Courage Star Trek theme.

The ship is massive, put together through hard work and sweat (and a lot of welding). The trailer shows the Enterprise as never seen before. It is impressive as hell.

And how do you think the Trekkers reacted?

Um, they got into a huge, raging debate that the Enterprise was not built ON Earth, but in space about Earth.

I’m not kidding. The most heated online arguments after the beautiful trailer have been that everybody knows the Enterprise was built in space, and many have added theories as to why this is so, and many others have presented detailed scientific processes by which you can build a starship on Earth and then raise it into space. And it went on and on.

Oh, some complain the lettering of the name is the wrong font, and some say the angle of the nacelles is incorrect. But the majority of comments on trekmovie.com that day of the trailer release (over 500 of them) were debating — passionately — whether Enterprise was built in space above Earth or on Earth.

I’m not kidding.

May I say this to everyone who is already nitpicking a 30 second trailer: For everyone arguing canon about whether the Enterprise was built in San Francisco ORBIT or IN San Francisco (ON THE GROUND) — if anyone can cite a specific line of dialogue from any canon aired episode of any of the Trek series or movies confirming/denying this, please speak now, or shut up, willya? For 79 episodes, Kirk’s Enterprise 1701 said “USS ENTERPRISE, STARSHIP CLASS, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF.” on its dedication plaque — didn’t say anything about WHERE in the Bay City: Didn’t say ABOVE it, ON THE GROUND, at the Presidio, delivered by trolley, or in dry dock in geosynchronous orbit of the San Francisco. Just SAN FRANCISCO.

So that we can all be friends, sing Kumbaya, and move forward with our lives, I have come up with a Trek resolution that makes sense about the Enterprise’s construction. It’s based on, “A wizard did it,” the standard all-encompassing explanation for any continuity errors noticed by hardcore fans of any given fantasy show. If it doesn’t make sense, A Wizard Did It. Move on. So, with apologies to the Simpsons …

At the Star Trek / Comic Book / Xena convention …

Professor Frink: Yes, over here, n’hey, n’hey. In episode BF112, the Enterprise was clearly said to be built in space above San Francisco, and now you have it built on Earth, Please do explain it.

Lucy Lawless: Ah, yeah, well, whenever you notice something like that, the temporal cold war changed it.

Frink: I see, all right, yes, but in episode AG4, the font of the lettering on the hull —

Lucy Lawless: Temporal Cold War.

Frink: But in the same episode the proportion of the Nacelles–

Lucy Lawless: Temporal Cold War.

Frink: [under breath] Aw, for glaven out loud.

Bottom line I: there’s just no pleasing some people.

Bottom line II: If the images in the trailer are indicative of the type of movie experience coming in December, Star Trek may indeed rise from its ashes. I’ll be watching.

And for the record, EVERYONE knows the Enterprise was really built at Area 51.

Add to Bufferhttp://www.robertxgillis.com/uploaded_images/star-trek-uss-enterprise-b-780997.gifDigg ThisShare via email
+1Share on LinkedInShare on MyspacePin it on PinterestSubmit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on TwitterShare on Xing

by Robert Gillis

At the 2006 Comic Con, Paramount Pictures unveiled this teaser poster for Star Trek 11, due in 2008 and to be produced/directed by J.J. Abrams (Lost, Alias, etc).

Now, anyone who knows me will be surprised to hear this but I say it now — Star Trek is dead, let in rest in peace.

As one of the foremost Trekkers I know, the guy who can quote verbatim dialogue from the movies, the guy who has seen “Wrath of Khan” EASILY over 200 times, I say it’s time to let Star Trek rest.

Paramount clearly has no interest in the franchise. Judging by the ratings of the last two TV shows (Voyager, Enterprise) as well as the box-office take of the last few films, neither do the fans — or at least, that interest has severely dwindled. Enterprise, after all, was CANCELLED.

Trek has had its day and its glory days and died a sad death with the last film and the Enterprise finale (“These are the Voyages”) an episode that was indeed as an homage but was poorly written, and featured a grievous lack of finality for the crew and the completely unnecessary death of Trip Tucker. Despite the pleasure of seeing the always enjoyable Jonathan Frakes and Marina Sirtis, the finale was indeed appalling and undid a lot of the fourth season magic. The final death blow from Berman and Braga, thanks, guys. After a great fourth season with Manny Coto and the Reeves-Stevens at the helm — people who know and “get” Trek, we were treated to more drivel. And don’t even get me started on the “Alien Nazis” that Braga threw into the last ten seconds of a pretty excellent end to season three.

Now … I DO know what I am talking about … Consider:

In 1982 I saw “Wrath of Khan” and it blew me away. I was hooked and by summer’s end I’d seen all the old episodes (TOS) and Star Trek: The Motionless Picture (sorry, had to get that in). For years, I’ve loved the show, attended some conventions and enjoyed meeting the stars and shaking their hands. I watched the movies and episodes again and again. Some of the soundtracks – -particularly James Horner’s work on Trek’s II and III and some of Jerry Goldsmith’s work is beautiful and worth having. I became a Trekker.

I embraced Star Trek: The Next Generation (ST:TNG) and liked Voyager and Enterprise. (Never really took to DS9).

I’ve cherished the great movies (the even numbered movies and Search for Spock) and tolerated the bad (the odd movies except Search for Spock).

I have had lunch with George Takei and have met all of the original cast except DeForest Kelley. I have watched in awe, and stood and cheered, as Gene Roddenberry and Leonard Nimoy and William Shatner spoke in auditoriums. I have waited in line to see Trek films and followed Trek news on line.

I miss De Kelley and Jimmy Doohan. May they rest in peace.

Throughout it all, I have been a fan, using star dates in correspondence, writing Trek stories with friends, reading the books, watching and rewatching episodes and movies. I never dressed up as a character, certainly “had a life” and got that the show was — well, a TV show, but enjoyed it for solid entertainment and escapism.

I sum up the entire Star Trek franchise in the same manner producer Harve Bennet (Treks 2-5) once said of TOS: Trek was one third really good, one third OK, and one third ugh (Ugh meaning really bad). I feel that way about the franchise as a whole.

There were amazing stories over the last 40 years, and some of the writing in the shows had true moments of brilliance.

But it’s over. Despite a strong story idea, the last film, Star Trek: Nemesis, tanked at the box office ( I think many aspects of the film were great but there was way too much exposition, talky scenes, and a huge “been there, done that” feeling with Data’s brother android B4.)

The one exception seems to be the “new” episodes at Star Trek: New Voyages — fan produced, they are quite good and worth checking out HERE

I have always loved Star Trek. I always will. But it’s over. It had its glory days, its highs and its lows, and a few too many trips to the well. Will I see Trek 11? Sure, once, but only out of curiosity.

Star Trek is dead. Love live Star Trek.

Hailing frequencies closed.


However…

Acknowledging that I said “No more Star Trek movies” above, and to let the franchise die, I must add this thought:

This week it was announced that both William Shatner (Kirk) and Leonard Nimoy (Spock) were approached to be part of the new Trek film, and both expressed interest. This gives me some hope that the new movie could canonically right the greatest wrong in Star Trek: The meaningless death of James T. Kirk in Star Trek: Generations. Even Mr. Shatner must have thought (afterward) that Kirk’s demise was a bad idea, as his series of Trek novels resurrected Kirk and chronicles the captain’s continuing adventures in the 24th century with an aged Spock, McCoy, and Scotty, and the 24th century Trek crews.

In 1990, Harve Bennet, producer of Star Trek II-V, pitched a “Starfleet Academy” idea for Star Trek VI with a younger, new cast playing Kirk, Spock, and the other Original Series “Classic” crew members. Paramount reportedly balked that Shatner and Nimoy wouldn’t be in it, and Bennet wrote framing scenes at the beginning and end of the picture, where Admiral Kirk tells assembled cadets the story of how he met Spock all those years ago, and then the “younger cast” movie begins.

It looks like JJ Abrams is going in this direction as well. That’s great!

So here is my suggestion — since they’re bringing back Shatner’s Kirk, make it clear that Kirk is back from the dead by setting the framework portion of the story in the late 24th century, after the time of Kirk’s death on Veridian III (2371). Have Kirk in a post-Generations Starfleet uniform — the kind seen in the last three Trek films. Make a passing reference to the Enterprise E, or have a title card on the screen that established that the “older Kirk” part of the film takes place in, say, 2375 or 2379 (the “current” Next Generation time period). Anything to establish the date is AFTER Kirk’s death.

There’s no need to explain HOW Kirk came back from the dead– he’s known for cheating death after all. Leave that to the imagination of future story tellers.

And Shatner and Nimoy both look much older now, so the 24th century timeframe works better than pretending the framing portion of the film takes place, say, in the Classic Trek movie era.

It would be so simple — just a few lines of dialogue anywhere:

Use the lines that Spock used in Star Trek VI:

Officer: reacting to what seemed like a hopeless situation: “Then we’re dead.”
Kirk “I’ve been dead before.”

Or the line from Alien:

Officer: “I thought you were dead.”
Kirk: “I get that a lot.”

Or:

Spock: “Admiral … Jim … I am … pleased to see you
again.”
Kirk, teasing: “Your quite logical relief that Starfleet had not lost a highly proficient captain, I suppose?”
Spock, almost a smile but not: “No. I have missed my captain, and my friend. It is … good to have you back.”

Just a few lines of dialogue, appropriate to the characters, and the fans are left with the knowledge that Kirk somehow escaped his fate on Veridian III and lives on, a hero, he and Spock reunited. Fans would be a lot more invested in the “Young Kirk,” knowing that he would continue to cheat death and thrive all those years later, rather than seeing the “new” young Kirk and knowing of his final, meaningless death on an unheard of planet. THAT might make sequels a little more likely as well.

The fans would love it.

What do you think, Mr. Abrams? Mr. Nimoy? Mr. Shatner?

Add to Bufferhttp://www.robertxgillis.com/uploaded_images/teaserposter-754376.jpgDigg ThisShare via email
+1Share on LinkedInShare on MyspacePin it on PinterestSubmit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on TwitterShare on Xing